PPIH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FuelCell Energy has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of -83.96%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 21.88% beat FuelCell Energy's return on equity of -17.09%.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FuelCell Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.02 which suggests that it could fall by -23.33%. Given that FuelCell Energy has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe FuelCell Energy is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FuelCell Energy has a beta of 3.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 240.74%.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FuelCell Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FuelCell Energy pays out -2.54% of its earnings as a dividend.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.6M, which are smaller than FuelCell Energy quarterly revenues of $49.3M. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $2.5M is higher than FuelCell Energy's net income of -$41.4M. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while FuelCell Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.71x versus 1.92x for FuelCell Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marmion Industries has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 21.88% beat Marmion Industries's return on equity of --.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marmion Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perma-Pipe International Holdings has higher upside potential than Marmion Industries, analysts believe Perma-Pipe International Holdings is more attractive than Marmion Industries.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marmion Industries has a beta of -3.053, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 405.325%.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marmion Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marmion Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.6M, which are larger than Marmion Industries quarterly revenues of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $2.5M is higher than Marmion Industries's net income of --. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Marmion Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.71x versus -- for Marmion Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OriginClear has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of -241842.13%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 21.88% beat OriginClear's return on equity of --.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OriginClear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 564416.77%. Given that OriginClear has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe OriginClear is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OriginClear has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.267%.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OriginClear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OriginClear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.6M, which are larger than OriginClear quarterly revenues of $6.6K. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $2.5M is higher than OriginClear's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while OriginClear's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.71x versus 175.49x for OriginClear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Connections has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of 13.17%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 21.88% beat Waste Connections's return on equity of 11.96%.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Waste Connections has an analysts' consensus of $198.05 which suggests that it could grow by 14.83%. Given that Waste Connections has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe Waste Connections is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Connections has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.479%.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Connections offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Connections pays out 35.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Connections's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.6M, which are smaller than Waste Connections quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $2.5M is lower than Waste Connections's net income of $308M. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.90x while Waste Connections's PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.71x versus 5.13x for Waste Connections. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.