PLAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FormFactor has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Photronics's net margin of 9.01%. Photronics's return on equity of 9.49% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 14.83%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $53.56 which suggests that it could grow by 16.63%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than FormFactor, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than FormFactor.

Photronics has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.61%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $222.6M, which are larger than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $207.9M. Photronics's net income of $33.9M is higher than FormFactor's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while FormFactor's PE ratio is 26.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.72x versus 4.87x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IPG Photonics has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Photronics's net margin of -100.19%. Photronics's return on equity of 9.49% beat IPG Photonics's return on equity of -6.43%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand IPG Photonics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.32%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than IPG Photonics, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than IPG Photonics.

Photronics has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IPG Photonics has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.268%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IPG Photonics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IPG Photonics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $222.6M, which are smaller than IPG Photonics quarterly revenues of $233.1M. Photronics's net income of $33.9M is higher than IPG Photonics's net income of -$233.6M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while IPG Photonics's PE ratio is 23.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.72x versus 3.20x for IPG Photonics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kulicke & Soffa Industries has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Photronics's net margin of 6.68%. Photronics's return on equity of 9.49% beat Kulicke & Soffa Industries's return on equity of -6.55%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand Kulicke & Soffa Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.88%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than Kulicke & Soffa Industries, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than Kulicke & Soffa Industries.

Photronics has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kulicke & Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.381, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.105%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kulicke & Soffa Industries offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kulicke & Soffa Industries pays out -64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $222.6M, which are larger than Kulicke & Soffa Industries quarterly revenues of $181.3M. Photronics's net income of $33.9M is higher than Kulicke & Soffa Industries's net income of $12.1M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Kulicke & Soffa Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.72x versus 3.77x for Kulicke & Soffa Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 15.21% compared to Photronics's net margin of -44.61%. Photronics's return on equity of 9.49% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -10.25%.

Photronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $120.91 which suggests that it could grow by 6.41%. Given that Photronics has higher upside potential than Marvell Technology, analysts believe Photronics is more attractive than Marvell Technology.

Photronics has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.38% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.674%.

Photronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Photronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -22.16% of its earnings as a dividend.

Photronics quarterly revenues are $222.6M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Photronics's net income of $33.9M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of -$676.3M. Notably, Photronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Photronics is 1.72x versus 18.29x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.