PBPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Watch Restaurant Group has a net margin of -0.06% compared to Potbelly's net margin of -0.29%. Potbelly's return on equity of 93.4% beat First Watch Restaurant Group's return on equity of 1.85%.

Potbelly has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling upside risk potential of 50.97%. On the other hand First Watch Restaurant Group has an analysts' consensus of $20.91 which suggests that it could grow by 34.46%. Given that Potbelly has higher upside potential than First Watch Restaurant Group, analysts believe Potbelly is more attractive than First Watch Restaurant Group.

Potbelly has a beta of 1.681, which suggesting that the stock is 68.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Watch Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Potbelly has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Watch Restaurant Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potbelly pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Watch Restaurant Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potbelly quarterly revenues are $113.7M, which are smaller than First Watch Restaurant Group quarterly revenues of $282.2M. Potbelly's net income of -$62K is higher than First Watch Restaurant Group's net income of -$829K. Notably, Potbelly's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.89x while First Watch Restaurant Group's PE ratio is 91.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potbelly is 0.72x versus 0.91x for First Watch Restaurant Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Giant Group has a net margin of -0.06% compared to Potbelly's net margin of --. Potbelly's return on equity of 93.4% beat Giant Group's return on equity of --.

Potbelly has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling upside risk potential of 50.97%. On the other hand Giant Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Potbelly has higher upside potential than Giant Group, analysts believe Potbelly is more attractive than Giant Group.

Potbelly has a beta of 1.681, which suggesting that the stock is 68.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Group has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.106%.

Potbelly has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potbelly pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potbelly quarterly revenues are $113.7M, which are larger than Giant Group quarterly revenues of --. Potbelly's net income of -$62K is higher than Giant Group's net income of --. Notably, Potbelly's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.89x while Giant Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potbelly is 0.72x versus -- for Giant Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen has a net margin of -0.06% compared to Potbelly's net margin of -15.06%. Potbelly's return on equity of 93.4% beat Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57%.

Potbelly has a consensus price target of $16.67, signalling upside risk potential of 50.97%. On the other hand Sweetgreen has an analysts' consensus of $22.92 which suggests that it could grow by 81.3%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Potbelly, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Potbelly.

Potbelly has a beta of 1.681, which suggesting that the stock is 68.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Potbelly has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweetgreen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potbelly pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potbelly quarterly revenues are $113.7M, which are smaller than Sweetgreen quarterly revenues of $166.3M. Potbelly's net income of -$62K is higher than Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M. Notably, Potbelly's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.89x while Sweetgreen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potbelly is 0.72x versus 2.13x for Sweetgreen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.