ONEW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Academy Sports and Outdoors has a net margin of -0.08% compared to OneWater Marine's net margin of 3.41%. OneWater Marine's return on equity of -1.78% beat Academy Sports and Outdoors's return on equity of 19.86%.

OneWater Marine has a consensus price target of $16.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.33%. On the other hand Academy Sports and Outdoors has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24%. Given that Academy Sports and Outdoors has higher upside potential than OneWater Marine, analysts believe Academy Sports and Outdoors is more attractive than OneWater Marine.

OneWater Marine has a beta of 2.046, which suggesting that the stock is 104.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Academy Sports and Outdoors has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OneWater Marine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Academy Sports and Outdoors offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. OneWater Marine pays -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors pays out 7.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Academy Sports and Outdoors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

OneWater Marine quarterly revenues are $483.5M, which are smaller than Academy Sports and Outdoors quarterly revenues of $1.4B. OneWater Marine's net income of -$368K is lower than Academy Sports and Outdoors's net income of $46.1M. Notably, OneWater Marine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Academy Sports and Outdoors's PE ratio is 8.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneWater Marine is 0.12x versus 0.52x for Academy Sports and Outdoors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brilliant Earth Group has a net margin of -0.08% compared to OneWater Marine's net margin of -0.5%. OneWater Marine's return on equity of -1.78% beat Brilliant Earth Group's return on equity of -0.06%.

OneWater Marine has a consensus price target of $16.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.33%. On the other hand Brilliant Earth Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.13 which suggests that it could grow by 52.88%. Given that Brilliant Earth Group has higher upside potential than OneWater Marine, analysts believe Brilliant Earth Group is more attractive than OneWater Marine.

OneWater Marine has a beta of 2.046, which suggesting that the stock is 104.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brilliant Earth Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

OneWater Marine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brilliant Earth Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneWater Marine pays -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Brilliant Earth Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OneWater Marine quarterly revenues are $483.5M, which are larger than Brilliant Earth Group quarterly revenues of $93.9M. OneWater Marine's net income of -$368K is higher than Brilliant Earth Group's net income of -$466K. Notably, OneWater Marine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brilliant Earth Group's PE ratio is 50.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneWater Marine is 0.12x versus 0.19x for Brilliant Earth Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles & Colvard has a net margin of -0.08% compared to OneWater Marine's net margin of -69.04%. OneWater Marine's return on equity of -1.78% beat Charles & Colvard's return on equity of -47.77%.

OneWater Marine has a consensus price target of $16.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.33%. On the other hand Charles & Colvard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2955.56%. Given that Charles & Colvard has higher upside potential than OneWater Marine, analysts believe Charles & Colvard is more attractive than OneWater Marine.

OneWater Marine has a beta of 2.046, which suggesting that the stock is 104.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles & Colvard has a beta of 2.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.118%.

OneWater Marine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Charles & Colvard offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneWater Marine pays -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles & Colvard pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OneWater Marine quarterly revenues are $483.5M, which are larger than Charles & Colvard quarterly revenues of $5.3M. OneWater Marine's net income of -$368K is higher than Charles & Colvard's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, OneWater Marine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Charles & Colvard's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneWater Marine is 0.12x versus 0.05x for Charles & Colvard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunstock has a net margin of -0.08% compared to OneWater Marine's net margin of 6.7%. OneWater Marine's return on equity of -1.78% beat Sunstock's return on equity of 49.24%.

OneWater Marine has a consensus price target of $16.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.33%. On the other hand Sunstock has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OneWater Marine has higher upside potential than Sunstock, analysts believe OneWater Marine is more attractive than Sunstock.

OneWater Marine has a beta of 2.046, which suggesting that the stock is 104.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunstock has a beta of -5.196, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 619.571%.

OneWater Marine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunstock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OneWater Marine pays -94.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunstock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

OneWater Marine quarterly revenues are $483.5M, which are larger than Sunstock quarterly revenues of $3M. OneWater Marine's net income of -$368K is lower than Sunstock's net income of $201K. Notably, OneWater Marine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunstock's PE ratio is 1.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OneWater Marine is 0.12x versus 0.05x for Sunstock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.