Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…
Buy
68
ONEQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$75.48
Seasonality move
:
3.95%
Day range:
$74.65 - $75.60
52-week range:
$58.12 - $79.75
Dividend yield:
0.63%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
296.4K
Avg. volume:
360K
1-year change:
13.26%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
$75.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 0.63% | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
$103.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.44% | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
$400.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 0.45% | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
$232.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.24 | 0.42% | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
$105.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.23% | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
$70.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 1.39% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | 1.173 | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.176 | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | 1.175 | -- | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
-- | 1.141 | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | 2.195 | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | 3.353 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IVW?
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IVW?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or IVW More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.978%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IVW?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IVW?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IWF?
iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell 1000 Growth's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IWF?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell 1000 Growth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell 1000 Growth, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell 1000 Growth.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or IWF More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IWF?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. iShares Russell 1000 Growth offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell 1000 Growth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IWF?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell 1000 Growth quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell 1000 Growth's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell 1000 Growth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell 1000 Growth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IWY?
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IWY?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or IWY More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.427%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IWY?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IWY?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or QLD?
ProShares Ultra QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or QLD?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra QQQ, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than ProShares Ultra QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 QLDProShares Ultra QQQ0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or QLD More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra QQQ has a beta of 2.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 134.941%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or QLD?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. ProShares Ultra QQQ offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or QLD?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra QQQ quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra QQQ's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or TQQQ?
ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraPro QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or TQQQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraPro QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraPro QQQ, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than ProShares UltraPro QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or TQQQ More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.159, which suggesting that the stock is 15.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a beta of 3.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 252.185%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or TQQQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. ProShares UltraPro QQQ offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraPro QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or TQQQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraPro QQQ quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraPro QQQ's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraPro QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraPro QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…
UPS Stock Forecast: Is the 6.9% Dividend Too Good to Be True?
Parcel delivery giant UPS (NYSE:UPS) has seen its fair share…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
84
SBET alert for May 28
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 17.75% over the past day.
Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is down 6.03% over the past day.
Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28
ATS [ATS] is down 1.6% over the past day.
