OMIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Azenta has a net margin of -4136.7% compared to Singular Genomics Systems's net margin of -2.93%. Singular Genomics Systems's return on equity of -54.24% beat Azenta's return on equity of -7.49%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.92%. On the other hand Azenta has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.2%. Given that Azenta has higher upside potential than Singular Genomics Systems, analysts believe Azenta is more attractive than Singular Genomics Systems.

Singular Genomics Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Azenta has a beta of 1.475, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.482%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Azenta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singular Genomics Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Azenta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singular Genomics Systems quarterly revenues are $406K, which are smaller than Azenta quarterly revenues of $170.1M. Singular Genomics Systems's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Azenta's net income of -$5M. Notably, Singular Genomics Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Azenta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singular Genomics Systems is 18.09x versus 4.06x for Azenta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bionano Genomics has a net margin of -4136.7% compared to Singular Genomics Systems's net margin of -728.57%. Singular Genomics Systems's return on equity of -54.24% beat Bionano Genomics's return on equity of -158.95%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.92%. On the other hand Bionano Genomics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 246.74%. Given that Bionano Genomics has higher upside potential than Singular Genomics Systems, analysts believe Bionano Genomics is more attractive than Singular Genomics Systems.

Singular Genomics Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bionano Genomics has a beta of 2.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.987%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bionano Genomics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singular Genomics Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bionano Genomics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singular Genomics Systems quarterly revenues are $406K, which are smaller than Bionano Genomics quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Singular Genomics Systems's net income of -$16.8M is higher than Bionano Genomics's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, Singular Genomics Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bionano Genomics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singular Genomics Systems is 18.09x versus 0.40x for Bionano Genomics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bruker has a net margin of -4136.7% compared to Singular Genomics Systems's net margin of 4.73%. Singular Genomics Systems's return on equity of -54.24% beat Bruker's return on equity of 19.61%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.92%. On the other hand Bruker has an analysts' consensus of $74.01 which suggests that it could grow by 26.25%. Given that Bruker has higher upside potential than Singular Genomics Systems, analysts believe Bruker is more attractive than Singular Genomics Systems.

Singular Genomics Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bruker has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.959%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bruker offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Singular Genomics Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker pays out 6.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singular Genomics Systems quarterly revenues are $406K, which are smaller than Bruker quarterly revenues of $864.4M. Singular Genomics Systems's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Bruker's net income of $40.9M. Notably, Singular Genomics Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bruker's PE ratio is 28.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singular Genomics Systems is 18.09x versus 2.68x for Bruker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harvard Bioscience has a net margin of -4136.7% compared to Singular Genomics Systems's net margin of -21.86%. Singular Genomics Systems's return on equity of -54.24% beat Harvard Bioscience's return on equity of -20.42%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.92%. On the other hand Harvard Bioscience has an analysts' consensus of $6.25 which suggests that it could grow by 196.21%. Given that Harvard Bioscience has higher upside potential than Singular Genomics Systems, analysts believe Harvard Bioscience is more attractive than Singular Genomics Systems.

Singular Genomics Systems has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvard Bioscience has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.945%.

Singular Genomics Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvard Bioscience offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singular Genomics Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvard Bioscience pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singular Genomics Systems quarterly revenues are $406K, which are smaller than Harvard Bioscience quarterly revenues of $22M. Singular Genomics Systems's net income of -$16.8M is lower than Harvard Bioscience's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Singular Genomics Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvard Bioscience's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singular Genomics Systems is 18.09x versus 0.93x for Harvard Bioscience. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.