Why Is AT&T Stock Dropping?
The telecommunications giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) has perhaps surprisingly eclipsed…
Sell
30
NHTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.66
Seasonality move
:
33.83%
Day range:
$4.63 - $4.80
52-week range:
$4.02 - $7.40
Dividend yield:
16.7%
P/E ratio:
65.58x
P/S ratio:
1.28x
P/B ratio:
1.56x
Volume:
24.1K
Avg. volume:
24.3K
1-year change:
-20.83%
Market cap:
$55.1M
Revenue:
$43.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMHZ
Banny Cosmic International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$42.4M | -- | 19.89% | -- | -- |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEST
Vestiage
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
$4.79 | -- | $55.1M | 65.58x | $0.20 | 16.7% | 1.28x |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
$1.47 | -- | $28.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.21x |
|
CMHZ
Banny Cosmic International Holdings
|
$0.0027 | -- | $381.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$7.13 | -- | $185.4M | 29.71x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.13x |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
$1.82 | -- | $20.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
|
VEST
Vestiage
|
$0.1000 | -- | $1.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
-- | 0.618 | -- | 2.19x |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
109.08% | 0.387 | 173.04% | 0.06x |
|
CMHZ
Banny Cosmic International Holdings
|
-- | 16.514 | -- | -- |
|
ELA
Envela
|
21.31% | 1.530 | 9.71% | 2.00x |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
15.24% | 2.002 | 33.99% | 1.91x |
|
VEST
Vestiage
|
-- | 0.180 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
|
$7.9M | -$275K | 1.92% | 1.92% | -2.57% | -$443K |
|
BGI
Birks Group
|
-- | -- | -7.15% | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMHZ
Banny Cosmic International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$11.5M | $2M | 10.11% | 13.11% | 5.03% | $1.5M |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -18.52% | -23.75% | -- | -- |
|
VEST
Vestiage
|
-- | -$10K | -- | -- | -- | -$13.2K |
Natural Health Trends vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NHTC or BGI?
Birks Group has a net margin of 0.33% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of --. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92% beat Birks Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NHTCNatural Health Trends74.14% $0.00 $35.3M BGIBirks Group-- -- $67M -
What do Analysts Say About NHTC or BGI?
Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 526.31%. On the other hand Birks Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Birks Group, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Birks Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NHTCNatural Health Trends0 0 0 BGIBirks Group0 0 0 -
Is NHTC or BGI More Risky?
Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.026%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NHTC or BGI?
Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.7%. Birks Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NHTC or BGI?
Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are larger than Birks Group quarterly revenues of --. Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K is higher than Birks Group's net income of --. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.58x while Birks Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.28x versus 0.21x for Birks Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NHTCNatural Health Trends1.28x 65.58x $10.7M $35K BGIBirks Group0.21x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NHTC or CMHZ?
Banny Cosmic International Holdings has a net margin of 0.33% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of --. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92% beat Banny Cosmic International Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NHTCNatural Health Trends74.14% $0.00 $35.3M CMHZBanny Cosmic International Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NHTC or CMHZ?
Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 526.31%. On the other hand Banny Cosmic International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Banny Cosmic International Holdings, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Banny Cosmic International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NHTCNatural Health Trends0 0 0 CMHZBanny Cosmic International Holdings0 0 0 -
Is NHTC or CMHZ More Risky?
Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Banny Cosmic International Holdings has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.148%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NHTC or CMHZ?
Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.7%. Banny Cosmic International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Banny Cosmic International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NHTC or CMHZ?
Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are larger than Banny Cosmic International Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K is higher than Banny Cosmic International Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.58x while Banny Cosmic International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.28x versus -- for Banny Cosmic International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NHTCNatural Health Trends1.28x 65.58x $10.7M $35K CMHZBanny Cosmic International Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NHTC or ELA?
Envela has a net margin of 0.33% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of 3.59%. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92% beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NHTCNatural Health Trends74.14% $0.00 $35.3M ELAEnvela24.44% $0.06 $65M -
What do Analysts Say About NHTC or ELA?
Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 526.31%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.2%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Envela.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NHTCNatural Health Trends0 0 0 ELAEnvela0 0 0 -
Is NHTC or ELA More Risky?
Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.042%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NHTC or ELA?
Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.7%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NHTC or ELA?
Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K is lower than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.58x while Envela's PE ratio is 29.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.28x versus 1.13x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NHTCNatural Health Trends1.28x 65.58x $10.7M $35K ELAEnvela1.13x 29.71x $46.9M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NHTC or MGIH?
Millennium Group International Holdings has a net margin of 0.33% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of --. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92% beat Millennium Group International Holdings's return on equity of -23.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NHTCNatural Health Trends74.14% $0.00 $35.3M MGIHMillennium Group International Holdings-- -- $36.6M -
What do Analysts Say About NHTC or MGIH?
Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 526.31%. On the other hand Millennium Group International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Millennium Group International Holdings, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Millennium Group International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NHTCNatural Health Trends0 0 0 MGIHMillennium Group International Holdings0 0 0 -
Is NHTC or MGIH More Risky?
Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Millennium Group International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NHTC or MGIH?
Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.7%. Millennium Group International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Millennium Group International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NHTC or MGIH?
Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are larger than Millennium Group International Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K is higher than Millennium Group International Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.58x while Millennium Group International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.28x versus 0.53x for Millennium Group International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NHTCNatural Health Trends1.28x 65.58x $10.7M $35K MGIHMillennium Group International Holdings0.53x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NHTC or VEST?
Vestiage has a net margin of 0.33% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of --. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92% beat Vestiage's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NHTCNatural Health Trends74.14% $0.00 $35.3M VESTVestiage-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About NHTC or VEST?
Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 526.31%. On the other hand Vestiage has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Vestiage, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Vestiage.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NHTCNatural Health Trends0 0 0 VESTVestiage0 0 0 -
Is NHTC or VEST More Risky?
Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.721% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vestiage has a beta of 19.961, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1896.116%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NHTC or VEST?
Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.7%. Vestiage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Vestiage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NHTC or VEST?
Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are larger than Vestiage quarterly revenues of --. Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K is higher than Vestiage's net income of -$10K. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.58x while Vestiage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.28x versus -- for Vestiage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NHTCNatural Health Trends1.28x 65.58x $10.7M $35K VESTVestiage-- -- -- -$10K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Express Stock Going Lower?
American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) has long been a Buffett favorite…
Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
QMCO alert for Jan 18
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Buy
51
QRVO alert for Jan 18
Qorvo [QRVO] is up 14.47% over the past day.
Sell
31
ATEX alert for Jan 18
Anterix [ATEX] is up 11.14% over the past day.
