MPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 36.89%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.81, signalling upside risk potential of 14.04%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $246.28 which suggests that it could grow by 1.74%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Broadcom.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.6%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 116.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.48x versus 21.23x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 9.39%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.81, signalling upside risk potential of 14.04%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $91.09 which suggests that it could grow by 51.35%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.607%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.48x versus 8.04x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 42.61%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.81, signalling upside risk potential of 14.04%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $169.75 which suggests that it could grow by 25.62%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.31%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 43.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.48x versus 22.51x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of 20.99% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 28.98%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 69.91% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.74%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $754.81, signalling upside risk potential of 14.04%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $178.55 which suggests that it could fall by -2.33%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.158%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $637.6M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $133.8M is lower than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 34.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 13.48x versus 10.46x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.