MNTK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluence Energy has a net margin of 25.86% compared to Montauk Renewables's net margin of 3.9%. Montauk Renewables's return on equity of 8.99% beat Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1%.

Montauk Renewables has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.73%. On the other hand Fluence Energy has an analysts' consensus of $26.77 which suggests that it could grow by 53.94%. Given that Fluence Energy has higher upside potential than Montauk Renewables, analysts believe Fluence Energy is more attractive than Montauk Renewables.

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Montauk Renewables has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluence Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montauk Renewables pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluence Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montauk Renewables quarterly revenues are $65.9M, which are smaller than Fluence Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Montauk Renewables's net income of $17M is lower than Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M. Notably, Montauk Renewables's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while Fluence Energy's PE ratio is 129.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montauk Renewables is 3.25x versus 0.90x for Fluence Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hawaiian Electric Industries has a net margin of 25.86% compared to Montauk Renewables's net margin of -11.08%. Montauk Renewables's return on equity of 8.99% beat Hawaiian Electric Industries's return on equity of -67.77%.

Montauk Renewables has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.73%. On the other hand Hawaiian Electric Industries has an analysts' consensus of $10.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.29%. Given that Montauk Renewables has higher upside potential than Hawaiian Electric Industries, analysts believe Montauk Renewables is more attractive than Hawaiian Electric Industries.

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hawaiian Electric Industries has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.456%.

Montauk Renewables has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hawaiian Electric Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Montauk Renewables pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawaiian Electric Industries pays out 65.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawaiian Electric Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Montauk Renewables quarterly revenues are $65.9M, which are smaller than Hawaiian Electric Industries quarterly revenues of $938.4M. Montauk Renewables's net income of $17M is higher than Hawaiian Electric Industries's net income of -$103.9M. Notably, Montauk Renewables's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while Hawaiian Electric Industries's PE ratio is 6.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montauk Renewables is 3.25x versus 0.28x for Hawaiian Electric Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Vault Holdings has a net margin of 25.86% compared to Montauk Renewables's net margin of -2217.93%. Montauk Renewables's return on equity of 8.99% beat Energy Vault Holdings's return on equity of -45.81%.

Montauk Renewables has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.73%. On the other hand Energy Vault Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.54 which suggests that it could fall by -13.97%. Given that Montauk Renewables has higher upside potential than Energy Vault Holdings, analysts believe Montauk Renewables is more attractive than Energy Vault Holdings.

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Vault Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Montauk Renewables has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Vault Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montauk Renewables pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Vault Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montauk Renewables quarterly revenues are $65.9M, which are larger than Energy Vault Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Montauk Renewables's net income of $17M is higher than Energy Vault Holdings's net income of -$26.6M. Notably, Montauk Renewables's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while Energy Vault Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montauk Renewables is 3.25x versus 2.79x for Energy Vault Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 25.86% compared to Montauk Renewables's net margin of 30.27%. Montauk Renewables's return on equity of 8.99% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Montauk Renewables has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 33.73%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $253.74 which suggests that it could grow by 16.29%. Given that Montauk Renewables has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Montauk Renewables is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Montauk Renewables has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montauk Renewables pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montauk Renewables quarterly revenues are $65.9M, which are smaller than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Montauk Renewables's net income of $17M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Montauk Renewables's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montauk Renewables is 3.25x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.