MBOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Retractable Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Microbot Medical's net margin of -18.58%. Microbot Medical's return on equity of -- beat Retractable Technologies's return on equity of -16.83%.

Microbot Medical has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 252.94%. On the other hand Retractable Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Microbot Medical has higher upside potential than Retractable Technologies, analysts believe Microbot Medical is more attractive than Retractable Technologies.

Microbot Medical has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Retractable Technologies has a beta of 1.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.995%.

Microbot Medical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Retractable Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microbot Medical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Retractable Technologies pays out -1.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

Microbot Medical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Retractable Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Microbot Medical's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Retractable Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Microbot Medical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Retractable Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microbot Medical is -- versus 0.69x for Retractable Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VolitionRX has a net margin of -- compared to Microbot Medical's net margin of -1226.82%. Microbot Medical's return on equity of -- beat VolitionRX's return on equity of --.

Microbot Medical has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 252.94%. On the other hand VolitionRX has an analysts' consensus of $2.92 which suggests that it could grow by 490.95%. Given that VolitionRX has higher upside potential than Microbot Medical, analysts believe VolitionRX is more attractive than Microbot Medical.

Microbot Medical has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VolitionRX has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.339%.

Microbot Medical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VolitionRX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microbot Medical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VolitionRX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microbot Medical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VolitionRX quarterly revenues of $474.5K. Microbot Medical's net income of -$3.4M is higher than VolitionRX's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Microbot Medical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VolitionRX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microbot Medical is -- versus 34.71x for VolitionRX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Catheter Precision has a net margin of -- compared to Microbot Medical's net margin of -4291.67%. Microbot Medical's return on equity of -- beat Catheter Precision's return on equity of -65.84%.

Microbot Medical has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 252.94%. On the other hand Catheter Precision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 580.5%. Given that Catheter Precision has higher upside potential than Microbot Medical, analysts believe Catheter Precision is more attractive than Microbot Medical.

Microbot Medical has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Catheter Precision has a beta of -0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.02%.

Microbot Medical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Catheter Precision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microbot Medical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Catheter Precision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microbot Medical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Catheter Precision quarterly revenues of $96K. Microbot Medical's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Catheter Precision's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Microbot Medical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Catheter Precision's PE ratio is 0.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microbot Medical is -- versus 2.02x for Catheter Precision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xtant Medical Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Microbot Medical's net margin of -10.04%. Microbot Medical's return on equity of -- beat Xtant Medical Holdings's return on equity of -35.34%.

Microbot Medical has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 252.94%. On the other hand Xtant Medical Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 236.54%. Given that Microbot Medical has higher upside potential than Xtant Medical Holdings, analysts believe Microbot Medical is more attractive than Xtant Medical Holdings.

Microbot Medical has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtant Medical Holdings has a beta of -0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.425%.

Microbot Medical has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xtant Medical Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microbot Medical pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtant Medical Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microbot Medical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtant Medical Holdings quarterly revenues of $31.5M. Microbot Medical's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Xtant Medical Holdings's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Microbot Medical's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtant Medical Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microbot Medical is -- versus 0.59x for Xtant Medical Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.