MBLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -23.29% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 4.26%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.64% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $19.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.17%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 76.06%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.396%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $438M, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $167.1M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$102M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 6.75x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -23.29% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -3528.43%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.64% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $19.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.17%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $438M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Mobileye Global's net income of -$102M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 6.75x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REE Automotive has a net margin of -23.29% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -349890.91%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.64% beat REE Automotive's return on equity of -144.74%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $19.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.17%. On the other hand REE Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 207.69%. Given that REE Automotive has higher upside potential than Mobileye Global, analysts believe REE Automotive is more attractive than Mobileye Global.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REE Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REE Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. REE Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $438M, which are larger than REE Automotive quarterly revenues of $11K. Mobileye Global's net income of -$102M is lower than REE Automotive's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REE Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 6.75x versus 23.54x for REE Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of -23.29% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of 3.75%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.64% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 8.82%.

Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $19.01, signalling upside risk potential of 23.17%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.26%. Given that Mobileye Global has higher upside potential than Strattec Security, analysts believe Mobileye Global is more attractive than Strattec Security.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.206%.

Mobileye Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobileye Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobileye Global quarterly revenues are $438M, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Mobileye Global's net income of -$102M is lower than Strattec Security's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Mobileye Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 12.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobileye Global is 6.75x versus 0.44x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.