LPLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innventure has a net margin of 8.68% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of -697.48%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 39.98% beat Innventure's return on equity of --.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $400.62, signalling upside risk potential of 4.04%. On the other hand Innventure has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 238.98%. Given that Innventure has higher upside potential than LPL Financial Holdings, analysts believe Innventure is more attractive than LPL Financial Holdings.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innventure has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Innventure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Innventure pays out -0.85% of its earnings as a dividend. LPL Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Innventure quarterly revenues of $317K. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $318.6M is higher than Innventure's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Innventure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 2.20x versus 147.21x for Innventure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OFS Capital has a net margin of 8.68% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of 95.88%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 39.98% beat OFS Capital's return on equity of 19.2%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $400.62, signalling upside risk potential of 4.04%. On the other hand OFS Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.22%. Given that LPL Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than OFS Capital, analysts believe LPL Financial Holdings is more attractive than OFS Capital.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OFS Capital has a beta of 1.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.089%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. OFS Capital offers a yield of 15.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. OFS Capital pays out 64.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than OFS Capital quarterly revenues of -$6.2M. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $318.6M is higher than OFS Capital's net income of -$7.3M. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while OFS Capital's PE ratio is 3.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 2.20x versus 3.41x for OFS Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 8.68% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of 34.1%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 39.98% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $400.62, signalling upside risk potential of 4.04%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.79 which suggests that it could grow by 3.02%. Given that LPL Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe LPL Financial Holdings is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.659%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $318.6M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 26.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 2.20x versus 7.80x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stifel Financial has a net margin of 8.68% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of 4.28%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 39.98% beat Stifel Financial's return on equity of 11.31%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $400.62, signalling upside risk potential of 4.04%. On the other hand Stifel Financial has an analysts' consensus of $102.43 which suggests that it could grow by 3.15%. Given that LPL Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Stifel Financial, analysts believe LPL Financial Holdings is more attractive than Stifel Financial.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.646, which suggesting that the stock is 35.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stifel Financial has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.051%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Stifel Financial offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Stifel Financial pays out 31.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Stifel Financial quarterly revenues of $1.2B. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $318.6M is higher than Stifel Financial's net income of $53M. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Stifel Financial's PE ratio is 18.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 2.20x versus 2.21x for Stifel Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.