LNZA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PureCycle Technologies has a net margin of -577.6% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of --. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58% beat PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of --.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $3.25, signalling upside risk potential of 113.82%. On the other hand PureCycle Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $12.10 which suggests that it could grow by 36.74%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PureCycle Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PureCycle Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.9M, which are larger than PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues of --. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M is higher than PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$90.6M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PureCycle Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 5.16x versus -- for PureCycle Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of -577.6% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of -53.41%. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49%.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $3.25, signalling upside risk potential of 113.82%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 100.91%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.445, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.533%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.9M, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $16.8M. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 5.16x versus 2.36x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -577.6% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of -349.06%. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58% beat Titan Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -443.56%.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $3.25, signalling upside risk potential of 113.82%. On the other hand Titan Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Titan Environmental Solutions, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Titan Environmental Solutions.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Titan Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Titan Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.9M, which are larger than Titan Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $3.9M. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M is lower than Titan Environmental Solutions's net income of -$13.6M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Titan Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 5.16x versus 3.41x for Titan Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a net margin of -577.6% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of 10.61%. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58% beat Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 8.6%.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $3.25, signalling upside risk potential of 113.82%. On the other hand Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $39.71 which suggests that it could grow by 4.02%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.762%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.9M, which are smaller than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues of $410M. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M is lower than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.5M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's PE ratio is 48.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 5.16x versus 4.31x for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.