Financhill
Sell
25

KMTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$22.52
Seasonality move :
--
Day range:
$21.76 - $23.02
52-week range:
$20.00 - $26.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
21.83x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
73K
Avg. volume:
183K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1B
Revenue:
$27.5M
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies
$15.7M -$0.53 -- -- $27.50
AKYA
Akoya Biosciences
$19.3M -$0.23 10.01% -62.5% $2.65
AZTA
Azenta
$140.8M $0.07 -11.53% 86.12% $41.00
BNGO
Bionano Genomics
$6.3M -$8.40 -9.75% -95.03% $7.00
BRKR
Bruker
$772.5M $0.44 3.18% 1050.16% $58.59
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience
$19.2M -$0.04 -19.63% -68.18% $4.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies
$21.84 $27.50 $1B -- $0.00 0% 21.83x
AKYA
Akoya Biosciences
$1.13 $2.65 $56M -- $0.00 0% 0.68x
AZTA
Azenta
$25.26 $41.00 $1.2B -- $0.00 0% 1.96x
BNGO
Bionano Genomics
$3.69 $7.00 $11.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.09x
BRKR
Bruker
$40.76 $58.59 $6.2B 53.63x $0.05 0.49% 1.81x
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience
$0.30 $4.50 $13.2M -- $0.00 0% 0.14x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies
-- 0.000 -- --
AKYA
Akoya Biosciences
90.93% 0.070 67.11% 1.66x
AZTA
Azenta
-- 2.222 -- 3.05x
BNGO
Bionano Genomics
23.43% -0.388 37.24% 0.86x
BRKR
Bruker
54.04% 0.828 23.46% 0.69x
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience
36.85% 2.159 39.74% 0.35x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
KMTS
Kestra Medical Technologies
-- -- -- -- -- --
AKYA
Akoya Biosciences
$14.4M -$5.7M -54.44% -212.99% -26.34% -$4M
AZTA
Azenta
$68.7M -$10.9M -7.97% -7.97% -7.4% $22M
BNGO
Bionano Genomics
-$8.4M -$22.6M -121.16% -158.95% -727.05% -$13.3M
BRKR
Bruker
$493.3M $157M 3.22% 6.78% 7.32% $153.3M
HBIO
Harvard Bioscience
$14M -$1.4M -11.92% -18.36% 5.88% $1.3M

Kestra Medical Technologies vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns KMTS or AKYA?

    Akoya Biosciences has a net margin of -- compared to Kestra Medical Technologies's net margin of -38.41%. Kestra Medical Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Akoya Biosciences's return on equity of -212.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    -- -- --
    AKYA
    Akoya Biosciences
    67.42% -$0.17 $83.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About KMTS or AKYA?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Akoya Biosciences has an analysts' consensus of $2.65 which suggests that it could grow by 135.56%. Given that Akoya Biosciences has higher upside potential than Kestra Medical Technologies, analysts believe Akoya Biosciences is more attractive than Kestra Medical Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    4 1 0
    AKYA
    Akoya Biosciences
    0 8 0
  • Is KMTS or AKYA More Risky?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Akoya Biosciences has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMTS or AKYA?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Akoya Biosciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kestra Medical Technologies pays -1.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Akoya Biosciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMTS or AKYA?

    Kestra Medical Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Akoya Biosciences quarterly revenues of $21.3M. Kestra Medical Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Akoya Biosciences's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Kestra Medical Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Akoya Biosciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kestra Medical Technologies is 21.83x versus 0.68x for Akoya Biosciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    21.83x -- -- --
    AKYA
    Akoya Biosciences
    0.68x -- $21.3M -$8.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns KMTS or AZTA?

    Azenta has a net margin of -- compared to Kestra Medical Technologies's net margin of -9.04%. Kestra Medical Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Azenta's return on equity of -7.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    -- -- --
    AZTA
    Azenta
    46.55% -$0.29 $1.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About KMTS or AZTA?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Azenta has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.31%. Given that Azenta has higher upside potential than Kestra Medical Technologies, analysts believe Azenta is more attractive than Kestra Medical Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    4 1 0
    AZTA
    Azenta
    1 5 0
  • Is KMTS or AZTA More Risky?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Azenta has a beta of 1.638, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.767%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMTS or AZTA?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Azenta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kestra Medical Technologies pays -1.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Azenta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMTS or AZTA?

    Kestra Medical Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Azenta quarterly revenues of $147.5M. Kestra Medical Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Azenta's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Kestra Medical Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Azenta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kestra Medical Technologies is 21.83x versus 1.96x for Azenta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    21.83x -- -- --
    AZTA
    Azenta
    1.96x -- $147.5M -$13.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns KMTS or BNGO?

    Bionano Genomics has a net margin of -- compared to Kestra Medical Technologies's net margin of -728.57%. Kestra Medical Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Bionano Genomics's return on equity of -158.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    -- -- --
    BNGO
    Bionano Genomics
    -139.08% -$0.52 $63.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About KMTS or BNGO?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Bionano Genomics has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 89.7%. Given that Bionano Genomics has higher upside potential than Kestra Medical Technologies, analysts believe Bionano Genomics is more attractive than Kestra Medical Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    4 1 0
    BNGO
    Bionano Genomics
    0 2 0
  • Is KMTS or BNGO More Risky?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bionano Genomics has a beta of 2.367, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.713%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMTS or BNGO?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bionano Genomics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kestra Medical Technologies pays -1.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Bionano Genomics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMTS or BNGO?

    Kestra Medical Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bionano Genomics quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Kestra Medical Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Bionano Genomics's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, Kestra Medical Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bionano Genomics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kestra Medical Technologies is 21.83x versus 0.09x for Bionano Genomics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    21.83x -- -- --
    BNGO
    Bionano Genomics
    0.09x -- $6.1M -$44.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns KMTS or BRKR?

    Bruker has a net margin of -- compared to Kestra Medical Technologies's net margin of 1.4%. Kestra Medical Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Bruker's return on equity of 6.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    -- -- --
    BRKR
    Bruker
    50.36% $0.09 $3.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About KMTS or BRKR?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Bruker has an analysts' consensus of $58.59 which suggests that it could grow by 43.75%. Given that Bruker has higher upside potential than Kestra Medical Technologies, analysts believe Bruker is more attractive than Kestra Medical Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    4 1 0
    BRKR
    Bruker
    6 7 0
  • Is KMTS or BRKR More Risky?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bruker has a beta of 1.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.782%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMTS or BRKR?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bruker offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Kestra Medical Technologies pays -1.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker pays out 26.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMTS or BRKR?

    Kestra Medical Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bruker quarterly revenues of $979.6M. Kestra Medical Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Bruker's net income of $13.7M. Notably, Kestra Medical Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bruker's PE ratio is 53.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kestra Medical Technologies is 21.83x versus 1.81x for Bruker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    21.83x -- -- --
    BRKR
    Bruker
    1.81x 53.63x $979.6M $13.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns KMTS or HBIO?

    Harvard Bioscience has a net margin of -- compared to Kestra Medical Technologies's net margin of 0.07%. Kestra Medical Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Harvard Bioscience's return on equity of -18.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    -- -- --
    HBIO
    Harvard Bioscience
    57.06% -- $100.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About KMTS or HBIO?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 25.92%. On the other hand Harvard Bioscience has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1400%. Given that Harvard Bioscience has higher upside potential than Kestra Medical Technologies, analysts believe Harvard Bioscience is more attractive than Kestra Medical Technologies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    4 1 0
    HBIO
    Harvard Bioscience
    1 1 0
  • Is KMTS or HBIO More Risky?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvard Bioscience has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.128%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMTS or HBIO?

    Kestra Medical Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvard Bioscience offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kestra Medical Technologies pays -1.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvard Bioscience pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMTS or HBIO?

    Kestra Medical Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvard Bioscience quarterly revenues of $24.6M. Kestra Medical Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Harvard Bioscience's net income of $18K. Notably, Kestra Medical Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvard Bioscience's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kestra Medical Technologies is 21.83x versus 0.14x for Harvard Bioscience. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMTS
    Kestra Medical Technologies
    21.83x -- -- --
    HBIO
    Harvard Bioscience
    0.14x -- $24.6M $18K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett

There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…

Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?

BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 10.54% over the past day.

Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8

Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 6.67% over the past day.

Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8

LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 1.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock