KEQU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Woodmark has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of 6.39%. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat American Woodmark's return on equity of 10.87%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -22.76%. On the other hand American Woodmark has an analysts' consensus of $70.33 which suggests that it could grow by 39.91%. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Kewaunee Scientific, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Kewaunee Scientific.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.561, which suggesting that the stock is 43.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Woodmark has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.87%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Woodmark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Woodmark pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are smaller than American Woodmark quarterly revenues of $400.4M. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is lower than American Woodmark's net income of $25.6M. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.13x while American Woodmark's PE ratio is 7.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.49x versus 0.45x for American Woodmark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of 2.26%. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -22.76%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.42%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Kewaunee Scientific, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Kewaunee Scientific.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.561, which suggesting that the stock is 43.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.311%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.13x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.49x versus 0.42x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of -3528.43%. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -22.76%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.89%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Kewaunee Scientific, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Kewaunee Scientific.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.561, which suggesting that the stock is 43.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.13x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.49x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kewaunee Scientific's net margin of --. Kewaunee Scientific's return on equity of 31.19% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Kewaunee Scientific has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -22.76%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kewaunee Scientific has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Kewaunee Scientific is more attractive than Northann.

Kewaunee Scientific has a beta of 0.561, which suggesting that the stock is 43.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kewaunee Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kewaunee Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kewaunee Scientific quarterly revenues are $67.2M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Kewaunee Scientific's net income of $1.4M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Kewaunee Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.13x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kewaunee Scientific is 0.49x versus 0.35x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.