Financhill
Sell
45

GMAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$20.97
Seasonality move :
4.06%
Day range:
$20.57 - $21.18
52-week range:
$17.24 - $28.96
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
12.46x
P/S ratio:
4.39x
P/B ratio:
2.44x
Volume:
824.1K
Avg. volume:
1.4M
1-year change:
-25.15%
Market cap:
$12.9B
Revenue:
$3B
EPS (TTM):
$1.68

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GMAB
Genmab AS
$759.6M $0.23 16.33% 7.82% $29.31
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
$107.9M -$1.71 294.46% -21.49% $221.46
EVAX
Evaxion AS
$60K -$0.71 -100% -90.33% $13.25
GLTO
Galecto
-- -$2.82 -- -51.46% $6.00
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$21.6B $2.58 1.79% 38.86% $169.18
NVO
Novo Nordisk AS
$11.9B $0.92 19.3% 36.74% $89.76
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GMAB
Genmab AS
$20.95 $29.31 $12.9B 12.46x $0.00 0% 4.39x
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
$162.84 $221.46 $9.9B -- $0.00 0% 24.25x
EVAX
Evaxion AS
$2.46 $13.25 $15.5M -- $0.00 0% 1.63x
GLTO
Galecto
$3.07 $6.00 $4.1M -- $0.00 0% --
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$155.21 $169.18 $373.4B 17.26x $1.30 3.23% 4.21x
NVO
Novo Nordisk AS
$71.50 $89.76 $317.7B 21.18x $1.14 2.32% 7.31x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GMAB
Genmab AS
-- 0.045 -- 5.32x
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
128.87% 0.179 9.75% 0.67x
EVAX
Evaxion AS
-- -0.376 -- 2.80x
GLTO
Galecto
-- 1.269 -- --
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
40.08% 0.200 13.1% 0.96x
NVO
Novo Nordisk AS
46.15% 1.792 5.59% 0.54x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GMAB
Genmab AS
$673M $188M 22.23% 22.23% 34.83% $257M
ASND
Ascendis Pharma AS
$87.8M -$106M -59.13% -880.05% -48.32% -$15.8M
EVAX
Evaxion AS
-- -$3.9M -238.97% -- -54.59% --
GLTO
Galecto
-- -$2.6M -- -- -- -$2.4M
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$14.5B $6.3B 19.44% 30.18% 63.19% $3.4B
NVO
Novo Nordisk AS
$9.2B $5.5B 53.78% 84.88% 54.06% $1.4B

Genmab AS vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GMAB or ASND?

    Ascendis Pharma AS has a net margin of 27.27% compared to Genmab AS's net margin of -93.73%. Genmab AS's return on equity of 22.23% beat Ascendis Pharma AS's return on equity of -880.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    94.13% $0.31 $5.3B
    ASND
    Ascendis Pharma AS
    82.65% -$1.66 $711.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About GMAB or ASND?

    Genmab AS has a consensus price target of $29.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.92%. On the other hand Ascendis Pharma AS has an analysts' consensus of $221.46 which suggests that it could grow by 36%. Given that Genmab AS has higher upside potential than Ascendis Pharma AS, analysts believe Genmab AS is more attractive than Ascendis Pharma AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4 4 0
    ASND
    Ascendis Pharma AS
    12 0 0
  • Is GMAB or ASND More Risky?

    Genmab AS has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ascendis Pharma AS has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.314%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMAB or ASND?

    Genmab AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ascendis Pharma AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genmab AS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ascendis Pharma AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMAB or ASND?

    Genmab AS quarterly revenues are $715M, which are larger than Ascendis Pharma AS quarterly revenues of $106.2M. Genmab AS's net income of $195M is higher than Ascendis Pharma AS's net income of -$99.6M. Notably, Genmab AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Ascendis Pharma AS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genmab AS is 4.39x versus 24.25x for Ascendis Pharma AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4.39x 12.46x $715M $195M
    ASND
    Ascendis Pharma AS
    24.25x -- $106.2M -$99.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns GMAB or EVAX?

    Evaxion AS has a net margin of 27.27% compared to Genmab AS's net margin of -64.14%. Genmab AS's return on equity of 22.23% beat Evaxion AS's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    94.13% $0.31 $5.3B
    EVAX
    Evaxion AS
    -- -$0.50 $74K
  • What do Analysts Say About GMAB or EVAX?

    Genmab AS has a consensus price target of $29.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.92%. On the other hand Evaxion AS has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 438.62%. Given that Evaxion AS has higher upside potential than Genmab AS, analysts believe Evaxion AS is more attractive than Genmab AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4 4 0
    EVAX
    Evaxion AS
    1 0 0
  • Is GMAB or EVAX More Risky?

    Genmab AS has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evaxion AS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMAB or EVAX?

    Genmab AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evaxion AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genmab AS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evaxion AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMAB or EVAX?

    Genmab AS quarterly revenues are $715M, which are larger than Evaxion AS quarterly revenues of $3M. Genmab AS's net income of $195M is higher than Evaxion AS's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Genmab AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Evaxion AS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genmab AS is 4.39x versus 1.63x for Evaxion AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4.39x 12.46x $715M $195M
    EVAX
    Evaxion AS
    1.63x -- $3M -$1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns GMAB or GLTO?

    Galecto has a net margin of 27.27% compared to Genmab AS's net margin of --. Genmab AS's return on equity of 22.23% beat Galecto's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    94.13% $0.31 $5.3B
    GLTO
    Galecto
    -- -$1.92 --
  • What do Analysts Say About GMAB or GLTO?

    Genmab AS has a consensus price target of $29.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.92%. On the other hand Galecto has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 95.44%. Given that Galecto has higher upside potential than Genmab AS, analysts believe Galecto is more attractive than Genmab AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4 4 0
    GLTO
    Galecto
    0 1 0
  • Is GMAB or GLTO More Risky?

    Genmab AS has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galecto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMAB or GLTO?

    Genmab AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galecto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genmab AS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galecto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMAB or GLTO?

    Genmab AS quarterly revenues are $715M, which are larger than Galecto quarterly revenues of --. Genmab AS's net income of $195M is higher than Galecto's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Genmab AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Galecto's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genmab AS is 4.39x versus -- for Galecto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4.39x 12.46x $715M $195M
    GLTO
    Galecto
    -- -- -- -$2.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns GMAB or JNJ?

    Johnson & Johnson has a net margin of 27.27% compared to Genmab AS's net margin of 50.24%. Genmab AS's return on equity of 22.23% beat Johnson & Johnson's return on equity of 30.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    94.13% $0.31 $5.3B
    JNJ
    Johnson & Johnson
    66.4% $4.54 $130.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About GMAB or JNJ?

    Genmab AS has a consensus price target of $29.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.92%. On the other hand Johnson & Johnson has an analysts' consensus of $169.18 which suggests that it could grow by 9%. Given that Genmab AS has higher upside potential than Johnson & Johnson, analysts believe Genmab AS is more attractive than Johnson & Johnson.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4 4 0
    JNJ
    Johnson & Johnson
    7 13 0
  • Is GMAB or JNJ More Risky?

    Genmab AS has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Johnson & Johnson has a beta of 0.425, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.471%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMAB or JNJ?

    Genmab AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Johnson & Johnson offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Genmab AS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson & Johnson pays out 84.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Johnson & Johnson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMAB or JNJ?

    Genmab AS quarterly revenues are $715M, which are smaller than Johnson & Johnson quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Genmab AS's net income of $195M is lower than Johnson & Johnson's net income of $11B. Notably, Genmab AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Johnson & Johnson's PE ratio is 17.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genmab AS is 4.39x versus 4.21x for Johnson & Johnson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4.39x 12.46x $715M $195M
    JNJ
    Johnson & Johnson
    4.21x 17.26x $21.9B $11B
  • Which has Higher Returns GMAB or NVO?

    Novo Nordisk AS has a net margin of 27.27% compared to Genmab AS's net margin of 37.18%. Genmab AS's return on equity of 22.23% beat Novo Nordisk AS's return on equity of 84.88%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    94.13% $0.31 $5.3B
    NVO
    Novo Nordisk AS
    83.49% $0.92 $37.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About GMAB or NVO?

    Genmab AS has a consensus price target of $29.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.92%. On the other hand Novo Nordisk AS has an analysts' consensus of $89.76 which suggests that it could grow by 25.54%. Given that Genmab AS has higher upside potential than Novo Nordisk AS, analysts believe Genmab AS is more attractive than Novo Nordisk AS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4 4 0
    NVO
    Novo Nordisk AS
    4 4 1
  • Is GMAB or NVO More Risky?

    Genmab AS has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novo Nordisk AS has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.706%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMAB or NVO?

    Genmab AS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Novo Nordisk AS offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share. Genmab AS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Nordisk AS pays out 43.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Nordisk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMAB or NVO?

    Genmab AS quarterly revenues are $715M, which are smaller than Novo Nordisk AS quarterly revenues of $11B. Genmab AS's net income of $195M is lower than Novo Nordisk AS's net income of $4.1B. Notably, Genmab AS's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Novo Nordisk AS's PE ratio is 21.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genmab AS is 4.39x versus 7.31x for Novo Nordisk AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMAB
    Genmab AS
    4.39x 12.46x $715M $195M
    NVO
    Novo Nordisk AS
    7.31x 21.18x $11B $4.1B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?

Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…

2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…

Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?

Asana stock hasn’t given many investors on Wall Street any…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31

Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock