FUFU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chenghe Acquisition II has a net margin of 22.52% compared to BitFuFu's net margin of --. BitFuFu's return on equity of 50.81% beat Chenghe Acquisition II's return on equity of --.

BitFuFu has a consensus price target of $8.64, signalling upside risk potential of 149.57%. On the other hand Chenghe Acquisition II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BitFuFu has higher upside potential than Chenghe Acquisition II, analysts believe BitFuFu is more attractive than Chenghe Acquisition II.

BitFuFu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chenghe Acquisition II has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BitFuFu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chenghe Acquisition II offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BitFuFu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chenghe Acquisition II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BitFuFu quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are larger than Chenghe Acquisition II quarterly revenues of --. BitFuFu's net income of $22.3M is higher than Chenghe Acquisition II's net income of $226.4K. Notably, BitFuFu's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Chenghe Acquisition II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BitFuFu is 1.24x versus -- for Chenghe Acquisition II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Columbus Acquisition has a net margin of 22.52% compared to BitFuFu's net margin of --. BitFuFu's return on equity of 50.81% beat Columbus Acquisition's return on equity of --.

BitFuFu has a consensus price target of $8.64, signalling upside risk potential of 149.57%. On the other hand Columbus Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BitFuFu has higher upside potential than Columbus Acquisition, analysts believe BitFuFu is more attractive than Columbus Acquisition.

BitFuFu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbus Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BitFuFu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Columbus Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BitFuFu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbus Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BitFuFu quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are larger than Columbus Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. BitFuFu's net income of $22.3M is higher than Columbus Acquisition's net income of $149.8K. Notably, BitFuFu's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Columbus Acquisition's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BitFuFu is 1.24x versus -- for Columbus Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lion Group Holding has a net margin of 22.52% compared to BitFuFu's net margin of --. BitFuFu's return on equity of 50.81% beat Lion Group Holding's return on equity of -50.99%.

BitFuFu has a consensus price target of $8.64, signalling upside risk potential of 149.57%. On the other hand Lion Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BitFuFu has higher upside potential than Lion Group Holding, analysts believe BitFuFu is more attractive than Lion Group Holding.

BitFuFu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lion Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BitFuFu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lion Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BitFuFu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lion Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BitFuFu quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are larger than Lion Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. BitFuFu's net income of $22.3M is higher than Lion Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, BitFuFu's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Lion Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BitFuFu is 1.24x versus 0.02x for Lion Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Acquisition Corp II has a net margin of 22.52% compared to BitFuFu's net margin of --. BitFuFu's return on equity of 50.81% beat RF Acquisition Corp II's return on equity of --.

BitFuFu has a consensus price target of $8.64, signalling upside risk potential of 149.57%. On the other hand RF Acquisition Corp II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BitFuFu has higher upside potential than RF Acquisition Corp II, analysts believe BitFuFu is more attractive than RF Acquisition Corp II.

BitFuFu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Acquisition Corp II has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BitFuFu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Acquisition Corp II offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BitFuFu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Acquisition Corp II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BitFuFu quarterly revenues are $99.2M, which are larger than RF Acquisition Corp II quarterly revenues of --. BitFuFu's net income of $22.3M is higher than RF Acquisition Corp II's net income of $1M. Notably, BitFuFu's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while RF Acquisition Corp II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BitFuFu is 1.24x versus -- for RF Acquisition Corp II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.