FOXX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Domo has a net margin of -35.85% compared to Foxx Development Holdings's net margin of -22.53%. Foxx Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Domo's return on equity of --.

Foxx Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Domo has an analysts' consensus of $12.80 which suggests that it could fall by -6.5%. Given that Domo has higher upside potential than Foxx Development Holdings, analysts believe Domo is more attractive than Foxx Development Holdings.

Foxx Development Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Domo has a beta of 1.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.128%.

Foxx Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Domo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foxx Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Domo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foxx Development Holdings quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than Domo quarterly revenues of $80.1M. Foxx Development Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is higher than Domo's net income of -$18.1M. Notably, Foxx Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Domo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxx Development Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.69x for Domo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Duos Technologies Group has a net margin of -35.85% compared to Foxx Development Holdings's net margin of -42%. Foxx Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Duos Technologies Group's return on equity of -275.75%.

Foxx Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Duos Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.47%. Given that Duos Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Foxx Development Holdings, analysts believe Duos Technologies Group is more attractive than Foxx Development Holdings.

Foxx Development Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duos Technologies Group has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.219%.

Foxx Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duos Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foxx Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duos Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foxx Development Holdings quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are larger than Duos Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $5M. Foxx Development Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Duos Technologies Group's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Foxx Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Duos Technologies Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxx Development Holdings is 0.68x versus 6.24x for Duos Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nutanix has a net margin of -35.85% compared to Foxx Development Holdings's net margin of 9.92%. Foxx Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Nutanix's return on equity of --.

Foxx Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nutanix has an analysts' consensus of $91.05 which suggests that it could grow by 23.7%. Given that Nutanix has higher upside potential than Foxx Development Holdings, analysts believe Nutanix is more attractive than Foxx Development Holdings.

Foxx Development Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nutanix has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.456%.

Foxx Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nutanix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foxx Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nutanix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foxx Development Holdings quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than Nutanix quarterly revenues of $639M. Foxx Development Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Nutanix's net income of $63.4M. Notably, Foxx Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nutanix's PE ratio is 3,680.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxx Development Holdings is 0.68x versus 8.65x for Nutanix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teradata has a net margin of -35.85% compared to Foxx Development Holdings's net margin of 10.53%. Foxx Development Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Teradata's return on equity of 126.61%.

Foxx Development Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Teradata has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.17%. Given that Teradata has higher upside potential than Foxx Development Holdings, analysts believe Teradata is more attractive than Foxx Development Holdings.

Foxx Development Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teradata has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.861%.

Foxx Development Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teradata offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foxx Development Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradata pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foxx Development Holdings quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than Teradata quarterly revenues of $418M. Foxx Development Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Teradata's net income of $44M. Notably, Foxx Development Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teradata's PE ratio is 15.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxx Development Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.27x for Teradata. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.