FORR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of -361.04%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43%.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.44%. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of $3.67 which suggests that it could grow by 307.8%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than Forrester Research, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than Forrester Research.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 2.862, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.224%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are larger than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $24.2M. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is higher than Blink Charging's net income of -$87.4M. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.43x versus 0.61x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CRA International has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of 8.49%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat CRA International's return on equity of 22.6%.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.44%. On the other hand CRA International has an analysts' consensus of $235.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.54%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than CRA International, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than CRA International.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRA International has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.041%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRA International offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International pays out 26.37% of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are smaller than CRA International quarterly revenues of $176.4M. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is lower than CRA International's net income of $15M. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while CRA International's PE ratio is 26.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.43x versus 1.79x for CRA International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of 30.92%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of --.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.44%. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 5,716.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 571546.478%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are larger than Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues of $66K. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is higher than Gold Rock Holdings's net income of $20.4K. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while Gold Rock Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.43x versus -- for Gold Rock Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

One World Universe has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of --. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat One World Universe's return on equity of --.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.44%. On the other hand One World Universe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than One World Universe.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison One World Universe has a beta of 2.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.066%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. One World Universe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. One World Universe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are larger than One World Universe quarterly revenues of --. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is higher than One World Universe's net income of --. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while One World Universe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.43x versus -- for One World Universe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.