EXE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of -17.65% compared to Expand Energy's net margin of 9.17%. Expand Energy's return on equity of 2.43% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.33%.

Expand Energy has a consensus price target of $114.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.61%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $177.15 which suggests that it could grow by 9.71%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Expand Energy, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Expand Energy.

Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.237%.

Expand Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Expand Energy pays 20.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 53.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expand Energy quarterly revenues are $646M, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.9B. Expand Energy's net income of -$114M is lower than Chevron's net income of $4.5B. Notably, Expand Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.65x while Chevron's PE ratio is 17.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expand Energy is 3.62x versus 1.53x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -17.65% compared to Expand Energy's net margin of 24.92%. Expand Energy's return on equity of 2.43% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

Expand Energy has a consensus price target of $114.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.61%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $212.77 which suggests that it could grow by 18.09%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Expand Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Expand Energy.

Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.879, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.947%.

Expand Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Expand Energy pays 20.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expand Energy quarterly revenues are $646M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Expand Energy's net income of -$114M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Expand Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.65x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 10.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expand Energy is 3.62x versus 3.48x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Fuel Gas has a net margin of -17.65% compared to Expand Energy's net margin of -45.05%. Expand Energy's return on equity of 2.43% beat National Fuel Gas's return on equity of 2.52%.

Expand Energy has a consensus price target of $114.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.61%. On the other hand National Fuel Gas has an analysts' consensus of $71.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than National Fuel Gas, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than National Fuel Gas.

Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Fuel Gas has a beta of 0.639, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.113%.

Expand Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. National Fuel Gas offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Expand Energy pays 20.13% of its earnings as a dividend. National Fuel Gas pays out 237.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but National Fuel Gas's is not.

Expand Energy quarterly revenues are $646M, which are larger than National Fuel Gas quarterly revenues of $372.1M. Expand Energy's net income of -$114M is higher than National Fuel Gas's net income of -$167.6M. Notably, Expand Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.65x while National Fuel Gas's PE ratio is 84.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expand Energy is 3.62x versus 3.24x for National Fuel Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Resources has a net margin of -17.65% compared to Expand Energy's net margin of 31.79%. Expand Energy's return on equity of 2.43% beat Permian Resources's return on equity of 11.48%.

Expand Energy has a consensus price target of $114.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.61%. On the other hand Permian Resources has an analysts' consensus of $18.95 which suggests that it could grow by 18.44%. Given that Permian Resources has higher upside potential than Expand Energy, analysts believe Permian Resources is more attractive than Expand Energy.

Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Resources has a beta of 4.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 331.753%.

Expand Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Permian Resources offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Expand Energy pays 20.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Resources pays out 29.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expand Energy quarterly revenues are $646M, which are smaller than Permian Resources quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Expand Energy's net income of -$114M is lower than Permian Resources's net income of $386.4M. Notably, Expand Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 65.65x while Permian Resources's PE ratio is 9.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expand Energy is 3.62x versus 2.06x for Permian Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.