DLPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of -14.19% compared to Dolphin Entertainment's net margin of -16.97%. Dolphin Entertainment's return on equity of -70.31% beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dolphin Entertainment has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Dolphin Entertainment is more attractive than Lendway.

Dolphin Entertainment has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 1.904, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.367%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dolphin Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dolphin Entertainment quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Dolphin Entertainment's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Dolphin Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dolphin Entertainment is 0.45x versus -- for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of -14.19% compared to Dolphin Entertainment's net margin of 3.22%. Dolphin Entertainment's return on equity of -70.31% beat Magnite's return on equity of 2.48%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $19.04 which suggests that it could grow by 10.95%. Given that Dolphin Entertainment has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe Dolphin Entertainment is more attractive than Magnite.

Dolphin Entertainment has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.248%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dolphin Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dolphin Entertainment quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than Magnite quarterly revenues of $162M. Dolphin Entertainment's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Magnite's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Dolphin Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magnite's PE ratio is 286.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dolphin Entertainment is 0.45x versus 3.68x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travelzoo has a net margin of -14.19% compared to Dolphin Entertainment's net margin of 15.84%. Dolphin Entertainment's return on equity of -70.31% beat Travelzoo's return on equity of 216.03%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand Travelzoo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.48%. Given that Dolphin Entertainment has higher upside potential than Travelzoo, analysts believe Dolphin Entertainment is more attractive than Travelzoo.

Dolphin Entertainment has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travelzoo has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.666%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travelzoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dolphin Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travelzoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dolphin Entertainment quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than Travelzoo quarterly revenues of $20.1M. Dolphin Entertainment's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Travelzoo's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Dolphin Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Travelzoo's PE ratio is 19.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dolphin Entertainment is 0.45x versus 3.25x for Travelzoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -14.19% compared to Dolphin Entertainment's net margin of -13.74%. Dolphin Entertainment's return on equity of -70.31% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 3.38%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $73.43 which suggests that it could grow by 34.04%. Given that Dolphin Entertainment has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, analysts believe Dolphin Entertainment is more attractive than Ziff Davis.

Dolphin Entertainment has a beta of 1.805, which suggesting that the stock is 80.453% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.028%.

Dolphin Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dolphin Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dolphin Entertainment quarterly revenues are $11.4M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $353.6M. Dolphin Entertainment's net income of -$1.6M is higher than Ziff Davis's net income of -$48.6M. Notably, Dolphin Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 46.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dolphin Entertainment is 0.45x versus 1.85x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.