CNVS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of 13.87%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 8.4%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.76%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $123.91 which suggests that it could grow by 10.61%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than The Walt Disney.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.888%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $23.6B. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 22.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.78x versus 2.17x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Media has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of 1.12%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat Liberty Media's return on equity of -1.44%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.76%. On the other hand Liberty Media has an analysts' consensus of $98.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.19%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Liberty Media, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Liberty Media.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Media has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.315%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are smaller than Liberty Media quarterly revenues of $447M. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is higher than Liberty Media's net income of $5M. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liberty Media's PE ratio is 73.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.78x versus 6.14x for Liberty Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -4.25%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.53%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.76%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.38%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Gaia, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Gaia.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.738%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $23.8M. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is higher than Gaia's net income of -$1M. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.78x versus 1.36x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Cineverse's net margin of 2.11%. Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 137.76%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.46 which suggests that it could grow by 2.3%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.986% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.824%.

Cineverse has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cineverse pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cineverse quarterly revenues are $40.7M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Cineverse's net income of $7.1M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Cineverse's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cineverse is 0.78x versus 0.28x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.