CNSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Altice USA has a net margin of -18.1% compared to Consolidated Communications Holdings's net margin of -1.93%. Consolidated Communications Holdings's return on equity of -25.13% beat Altice USA's return on equity of --.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.35, signalling downside risk potential of -7.84%. On the other hand Altice USA has an analysts' consensus of $3.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.01%. Given that Consolidated Communications Holdings has more downside risk than Altice USA, analysts believe Altice USA is more attractive than Consolidated Communications Holdings.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altice USA has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.828%.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Altice USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Communications Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Altice USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are smaller than Altice USA quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Consolidated Communications Holdings's net income of -$49.1M is lower than Altice USA's net income of -$43M. Notably, Consolidated Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Altice USA's PE ratio is 197.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Communications Holdings is 0.49x versus 0.12x for Altice USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a net margin of -18.1% compared to Consolidated Communications Holdings's net margin of -24.54%. Consolidated Communications Holdings's return on equity of -25.13% beat Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of 8.6%.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.35, signalling downside risk potential of -7.84%. On the other hand Cogent Communications Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.45 which suggests that it could grow by 7.5%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Consolidated Communications Holdings, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Consolidated Communications Holdings.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.392, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.791%.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cogent Communications Holdings offers a yield of 5.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Consolidated Communications Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings pays out 14.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Consolidated Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues of $257.2M. Consolidated Communications Holdings's net income of -$49.1M is higher than Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$63.1M. Notably, Consolidated Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cogent Communications Holdings's PE ratio is 97.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Communications Holdings is 0.49x versus 3.42x for Cogent Communications Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of -18.1% compared to Consolidated Communications Holdings's net margin of -4.6%. Consolidated Communications Holdings's return on equity of -25.13% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -270.39%.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.35, signalling downside risk potential of -7.84%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $5.27 which suggests that it could fall by -4.04%. Given that Consolidated Communications Holdings has more downside risk than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Lumen Technologies is more attractive than Consolidated Communications Holdings.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.756%.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Communications Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -0.11% of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Consolidated Communications Holdings's net income of -$49.1M is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$148M. Notably, Consolidated Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Communications Holdings is 0.49x versus 0.41x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ribbon Communications has a net margin of -18.1% compared to Consolidated Communications Holdings's net margin of -6.38%. Consolidated Communications Holdings's return on equity of -25.13% beat Ribbon Communications's return on equity of -12.61%.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.35, signalling downside risk potential of -7.84%. On the other hand Ribbon Communications has an analysts' consensus of $5.90 which suggests that it could grow by 43.9%. Given that Ribbon Communications has higher upside potential than Consolidated Communications Holdings, analysts believe Ribbon Communications is more attractive than Consolidated Communications Holdings.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.514% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ribbon Communications has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.476%.

Consolidated Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ribbon Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Communications Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ribbon Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Consolidated Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $271.1M, which are larger than Ribbon Communications quarterly revenues of $210.2M. Consolidated Communications Holdings's net income of -$49.1M is lower than Ribbon Communications's net income of -$13.4M. Notably, Consolidated Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ribbon Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Communications Holdings is 0.49x versus 0.88x for Ribbon Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.