CNFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ICC Holdings has a net margin of -14.12% compared to Conifer Holdings's net margin of 8.42%. Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39% beat ICC Holdings's return on equity of 9.55%.

Conifer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -40.2%. On the other hand ICC Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Conifer Holdings has higher upside potential than ICC Holdings, analysts believe Conifer Holdings is more attractive than ICC Holdings.

Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICC Holdings has a beta of 0.319, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.102%.

Conifer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICC Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conifer Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICC Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than ICC Holdings quarterly revenues of $24.4M. Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M is higher than ICC Holdings's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Conifer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.42x while ICC Holdings's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conifer Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.75x for ICC Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NMI Holdings has a net margin of -14.12% compared to Conifer Holdings's net margin of 55.88%. Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39% beat NMI Holdings's return on equity of 17.98%.

Conifer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -40.2%. On the other hand NMI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $42.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.34%. Given that NMI Holdings has higher upside potential than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe NMI Holdings is more attractive than Conifer Holdings.

Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NMI Holdings has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.845%.

Conifer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NMI Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conifer Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NMI Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than NMI Holdings quarterly revenues of $166.1M. Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M is lower than NMI Holdings's net income of $92.8M. Notably, Conifer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.42x while NMI Holdings's PE ratio is 8.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conifer Holdings is 0.14x versus 4.85x for NMI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palomar Holdings has a net margin of -14.12% compared to Conifer Holdings's net margin of 20.56%. Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39% beat Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.63%.

Conifer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -40.2%. On the other hand Palomar Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $121.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.08%. Given that Palomar Holdings has higher upside potential than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe Palomar Holdings is more attractive than Conifer Holdings.

Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.377, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.282%.

Conifer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palomar Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conifer Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palomar Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.4M. Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M is higher than Palomar Holdings's net income of $30.5M. Notably, Conifer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.42x while Palomar Holdings's PE ratio is 26.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conifer Holdings is 0.14x versus 5.64x for Palomar Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tiptree has a net margin of -14.12% compared to Conifer Holdings's net margin of 2.41%. Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39% beat Tiptree's return on equity of 6.8%.

Conifer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -40.2%. On the other hand Tiptree has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -76.89%. Given that Tiptree has more downside risk than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe Conifer Holdings is more attractive than Tiptree.

Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiptree has a beta of 1.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.798%.

Conifer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tiptree offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Conifer Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tiptree pays out 98.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiptree's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues are $16M, which are smaller than Tiptree quarterly revenues of $494.4M. Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M is higher than Tiptree's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Conifer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.42x while Tiptree's PE ratio is 20.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conifer Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.38x for Tiptree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.