Financhill
Sell
49

AUDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$8.90
Seasonality move :
1.9%
Day range:
$8.81 - $8.99
52-week range:
$7.70 - $12.72
Dividend yield:
4.05%
P/E ratio:
15.89x
P/S ratio:
1.12x
P/B ratio:
1.41x
Volume:
44.1K
Avg. volume:
59.6K
1-year change:
-11.44%
Market cap:
$262.3M
Revenue:
$242.2M
EPS (TTM):
$0.56

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AUDC
AudioCodes
$59.9M $0.18 0.22% 58.33% $11.75
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
-- -- -- -- --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$143.8M $0.25 9.12% 38.33% $16.00
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
-- -- -- -- --
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$8M -$0.18 32.69% -81.82% $2.50
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -- -- -- $8.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AUDC
AudioCodes
$8.90 $11.75 $262.3M 15.89x $0.18 4.05% 1.12x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
$102.00 -- $1.6B 19.54x $0.94 1.53% 0.57x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$15.23 $16.00 $747.8M 20.04x $0.33 5.04% 1.31x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
$1.40 -- $28.5M 8.24x $0.22 15.71% 1.40x
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$2.87 $2.50 $248.7M -- $0.00 0% 10.27x
SYNX
Silynxcom
$1.89 $8.00 $9.6M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AUDC
AudioCodes
-- 0.599 -- 1.66x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
40.56% 0.885 23.16% 1.23x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
17.29% 0.804 10.94% 1.51x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
-- -0.051 -- 2.09x
SATX
SatixFy Communications
-171.9% -1.213 68.23% 0.13x
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -0.088 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AUDC
AudioCodes
$39.1M $3.6M 9.21% 9.21% 6.04% $12M
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
$180.7M $70.5M 4.45% 6.05% 9.35% --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$40.6M $15.7M 10.38% 12.64% 10.69% $13.9M
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
$2.5M $370K 17.04% 17.04% 7.41% $680K
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$2.9M -$6.1M -- -- -124.84% --
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -- -- -- -- --

AudioCodes vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or FORTY?

    Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 2.56%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 6.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    23.95% $1.23 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985), analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or FORTY More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.804%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Formula Systems (1985) offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 23.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) quarterly revenues of $754.7M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is lower than Formula Systems (1985)'s net income of $19.3M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Formula Systems (1985)'s PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.12x versus 0.57x for Formula Systems (1985). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.12x 15.89x $60.4M $4M
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    0.57x 19.54x $754.7M $19.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or MGIC?

    Magic Software Enterprises has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 6.43%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 12.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    27.58% $0.19 $349.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.06%. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises, analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    0 1 0
  • Is AUDC or MGIC More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.065000000000004%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Magic Software Enterprises offers a yield of 5.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 27.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues of $147.3M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is lower than Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $9.5M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Magic Software Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.12x versus 1.31x for Magic Software Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.12x 15.89x $60.4M $4M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    1.31x 20.04x $147.3M $9.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or MNDO?

    MIND C.T.I. has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 9.81%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat MIND C.T.I.'s return on equity of 17.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I.
    50.22% $0.02 $20.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or MNDO?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I., analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than MIND C.T.I..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I.
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or MNDO More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.614%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or MNDO?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. MIND C.T.I. offers a yield of 15.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. pays out 105.14% of its earnings as a dividend. AudioCodes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MIND C.T.I.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or MNDO?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. quarterly revenues of $5M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is higher than MIND C.T.I.'s net income of $490K. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while MIND C.T.I.'s PE ratio is 8.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.12x versus 1.40x for MIND C.T.I.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.12x 15.89x $60.4M $4M
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I.
    1.40x 8.24x $5M $490K
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or SATX?

    SatixFy Communications has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of -209.12%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    58.75% -$0.12 -$41.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could fall by -12.89%. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than SatixFy Communications, analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than SatixFy Communications.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    1 1 0
  • Is AUDC or SATX More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AudioCodes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $4.9M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.12x versus 10.27x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.12x 15.89x $60.4M $4M
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    10.27x -- $4.9M -$10.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or SYNX?

    Silynxcom has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of --. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 20.79%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 323.28%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than AudioCodes, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than AudioCodes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    1 0 0
  • Is AUDC or SYNX More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.05%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AudioCodes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.12x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.12x 15.89x $60.4M $4M
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?
Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?

By every traditional yardstick, including a price‑to‑sales well above 100,…

Is Gamestop’s Bitcoin Strategy Going To Succeed?
Is Gamestop’s Bitcoin Strategy Going To Succeed?

When GameStop (NYSE: GME) announced in Q1 that its board had…

How High Will Roku Stock Go?
How High Will Roku Stock Go?

Streaming software and hardware maker Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) has seen its…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Alerts

Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 14

VEON [VEON] is down 18.57% over the past day.

Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 14

Dave [DAVE] is down 12.68% over the past day.

Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 14

Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 9.12% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock