ATOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cirrus Logic has a net margin of -130225% compared to Atomera's net margin of 16.79%. Atomera's return on equity of -93.98% beat Cirrus Logic's return on equity of 17.44%.

Atomera has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28%. On the other hand Cirrus Logic has an analysts' consensus of $123.19 which suggests that it could grow by 19.99%. Given that Atomera has higher upside potential than Cirrus Logic, analysts believe Atomera is more attractive than Cirrus Logic.

Atomera has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cirrus Logic has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.539%.

Atomera has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cirrus Logic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atomera pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cirrus Logic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atomera quarterly revenues are $4K, which are smaller than Cirrus Logic quarterly revenues of $424.5M. Atomera's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Cirrus Logic's net income of $71.3M. Notably, Atomera's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cirrus Logic's PE ratio is 17.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atomera is 1,460.02x versus 2.99x for Cirrus Logic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -130225% compared to Atomera's net margin of -8.74%. Atomera's return on equity of -93.98% beat inTest's return on equity of -0.1%.

Atomera has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 51.3%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than Atomera, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than Atomera.

Atomera has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.304%.

Atomera has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atomera pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atomera quarterly revenues are $4K, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Atomera's net income of -$5.2M is lower than inTest's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Atomera's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atomera is 1,460.02x versus 0.67x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IPG Photonics has a net margin of -130225% compared to Atomera's net margin of 1.65%. Atomera's return on equity of -93.98% beat IPG Photonics's return on equity of -9.35%.

Atomera has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28%. On the other hand IPG Photonics has an analysts' consensus of $66.40 which suggests that it could fall by -2.51%. Given that Atomera has higher upside potential than IPG Photonics, analysts believe Atomera is more attractive than IPG Photonics.

Atomera has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IPG Photonics has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.121%.

Atomera has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IPG Photonics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atomera pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IPG Photonics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atomera quarterly revenues are $4K, which are smaller than IPG Photonics quarterly revenues of $227.8M. Atomera's net income of -$5.2M is lower than IPG Photonics's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Atomera's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IPG Photonics's PE ratio is 22.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atomera is 1,460.02x versus 3.11x for IPG Photonics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -130225% compared to Atomera's net margin of 42.61%. Atomera's return on equity of -93.98% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Atomera has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.02 which suggests that it could grow by 19.49%. Given that Atomera has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Atomera is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Atomera has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

Atomera has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Atomera pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atomera quarterly revenues are $4K, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Atomera's net income of -$5.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Atomera's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 46.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atomera is 1,460.02x versus 23.98x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.