ADMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Catalyst Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of 95.19% compared to ADMA Biologics's net margin of 39.44%. ADMA Biologics's return on equity of 93.41% beat Catalyst Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of 27.81%.

ADMA Biologics has a consensus price target of $25.74, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Catalyst Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.99%. Given that Catalyst Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than ADMA Biologics, analysts believe Catalyst Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than ADMA Biologics.

ADMA Biologics has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Catalyst Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.371%.

ADMA Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ADMA Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ADMA Biologics quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are smaller than Catalyst Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $141.8M. ADMA Biologics's net income of $111.9M is higher than Catalyst Pharmaceuticals's net income of $55.9M. Notably, ADMA Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Catalyst Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is 17.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADMA Biologics is 12.45x versus 5.96x for Catalyst Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emergent BioSolutions has a net margin of 95.19% compared to ADMA Biologics's net margin of -16.54%. ADMA Biologics's return on equity of 93.41% beat Emergent BioSolutions's return on equity of -35.42%.

ADMA Biologics has a consensus price target of $25.74, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Emergent BioSolutions has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 145.9%. Given that Emergent BioSolutions has higher upside potential than ADMA Biologics, analysts believe Emergent BioSolutions is more attractive than ADMA Biologics.

ADMA Biologics has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emergent BioSolutions has a beta of 2.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.124%.

ADMA Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emergent BioSolutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ADMA Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emergent BioSolutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ADMA Biologics quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are smaller than Emergent BioSolutions quarterly revenues of $189.3M. ADMA Biologics's net income of $111.9M is higher than Emergent BioSolutions's net income of -$31.3M. Notably, ADMA Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Emergent BioSolutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADMA Biologics is 12.45x versus 0.29x for Emergent BioSolutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocular Therapeutix has a net margin of 95.19% compared to ADMA Biologics's net margin of -283.27%. ADMA Biologics's return on equity of 93.41% beat Ocular Therapeutix's return on equity of -62.66%.

ADMA Biologics has a consensus price target of $25.74, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand Ocular Therapeutix has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 126.98%. Given that Ocular Therapeutix has higher upside potential than ADMA Biologics, analysts believe Ocular Therapeutix is more attractive than ADMA Biologics.

ADMA Biologics has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocular Therapeutix has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.133%.

ADMA Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocular Therapeutix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ADMA Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocular Therapeutix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ADMA Biologics quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than Ocular Therapeutix quarterly revenues of $17.1M. ADMA Biologics's net income of $111.9M is higher than Ocular Therapeutix's net income of -$48.4M. Notably, ADMA Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Ocular Therapeutix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADMA Biologics is 12.45x versus 19.15x for Ocular Therapeutix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TG Therapeutics has a net margin of 95.19% compared to ADMA Biologics's net margin of 21.57%. ADMA Biologics's return on equity of 93.41% beat TG Therapeutics's return on equity of 12.81%.

ADMA Biologics has a consensus price target of $25.74, signalling upside risk potential of 17.75%. On the other hand TG Therapeutics has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.04%. Given that ADMA Biologics has higher upside potential than TG Therapeutics, analysts believe ADMA Biologics is more attractive than TG Therapeutics.

ADMA Biologics has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TG Therapeutics has a beta of 2.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.867%.

ADMA Biologics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TG Therapeutics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ADMA Biologics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TG Therapeutics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ADMA Biologics quarterly revenues are $117.5M, which are larger than TG Therapeutics quarterly revenues of $108.2M. ADMA Biologics's net income of $111.9M is higher than TG Therapeutics's net income of $23.3M. Notably, ADMA Biologics's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while TG Therapeutics's PE ratio is 295.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ADMA Biologics is 12.45x versus 19.68x for TG Therapeutics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.