ADEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of 30.23% compared to Adeia's net margin of 12.28%. Adeia's return on equity of 17.56% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12%.

Adeia has a consensus price target of $18.33, signalling upside risk potential of 53.03%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.63 which suggests that it could grow by 62.65%. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than Adeia, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than Adeia.

Adeia has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Adeia has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adeia pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adeia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adeia quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are smaller than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $190.6M. Adeia's net income of $36M is higher than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M. Notably, Adeia's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 38.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adeia is 3.60x versus 3.21x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of 30.23% compared to Adeia's net margin of -1.26%. Adeia's return on equity of 17.56% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

Adeia has a consensus price target of $18.33, signalling upside risk potential of 53.03%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 34.62%. Given that Adeia has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe Adeia is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Adeia has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Adeia has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adeia pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adeia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adeia quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Adeia's net income of $36M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Adeia's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adeia is 3.60x versus 3.12x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 30.23% compared to Adeia's net margin of -2893.73%. Adeia's return on equity of 17.56% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Adeia has a consensus price target of $18.33, signalling upside risk potential of 53.03%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Adeia has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Adeia is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Adeia has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Adeia has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adeia pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adeia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adeia quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Adeia's net income of $36M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Adeia's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adeia is 3.60x versus 0.58x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 30.23% compared to Adeia's net margin of -1.23%. Adeia's return on equity of 17.56% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Adeia has a consensus price target of $18.33, signalling upside risk potential of 53.03%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 147.15%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Adeia, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Adeia.

Adeia has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.204% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

Adeia has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.67%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adeia pays 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adeia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adeia quarterly revenues are $119.2M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Adeia's net income of $36M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Adeia's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.02x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adeia is 3.60x versus 0.18x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.