GFMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of -10.1%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Cineverse's return on equity of -60.86%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 111.86%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.949%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are smaller than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $12.7M. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of $8.2K is higher than Cineverse's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while Cineverse's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus 1.15x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everlert has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of --. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Everlert's return on equity of --.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Everlert has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goliath Film & Media Holdings has higher upside potential than Everlert, analysts believe Goliath Film & Media Holdings is more attractive than Everlert.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everlert has a beta of -0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.261%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everlert offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everlert pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are larger than Everlert quarterly revenues of --. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of $8.2K is higher than Everlert's net income of --. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while Everlert's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus -- for Everlert. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of 0.02%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.71 which suggests that it could grow by 23.73%. Given that Paramount Global has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Global is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.127%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of $8.2K is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TKO Group Holdings has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of 3.4%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TKO Group Holdings's return on equity of -0.31%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TKO Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $152.70 which suggests that it could grow by 7.39%. Given that TKO Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe TKO Group Holdings is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.609, which suggesting that the stock is 39.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TKO Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TKO Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.86 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TKO Group Holdings pays out 142.47% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are smaller than TKO Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $681.3M. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of $8.2K is lower than TKO Group Holdings's net income of $23.1M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while TKO Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus 5.35x for TKO Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.