FUGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcast Marketing Group has a net margin of -- compared to Fuego Enterprises's net margin of --. Fuego Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat Broadcast Marketing Group's return on equity of --.

Fuego Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Broadcast Marketing Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fuego Enterprises has higher upside potential than Broadcast Marketing Group, analysts believe Fuego Enterprises is more attractive than Broadcast Marketing Group.

Fuego Enterprises has a beta of 2.907, which suggesting that the stock is 190.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcast Marketing Group has a beta of -0.182, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.197%.

Fuego Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcast Marketing Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuego Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcast Marketing Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuego Enterprises quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Broadcast Marketing Group quarterly revenues of --. Fuego Enterprises's net income of -- is lower than Broadcast Marketing Group's net income of --. Notably, Fuego Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadcast Marketing Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuego Enterprises is -- versus -- for Broadcast Marketing Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CRA International has a net margin of -- compared to Fuego Enterprises's net margin of 8.49%. Fuego Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat CRA International's return on equity of 22.6%.

Fuego Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CRA International has an analysts' consensus of $235.50 which suggests that it could grow by 40.66%. Given that CRA International has higher upside potential than Fuego Enterprises, analysts believe CRA International is more attractive than Fuego Enterprises.

Fuego Enterprises has a beta of 2.907, which suggesting that the stock is 190.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRA International has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.831%.

Fuego Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRA International offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Fuego Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International pays out 26.37% of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fuego Enterprises quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CRA International quarterly revenues of $176.4M. Fuego Enterprises's net income of -- is lower than CRA International's net income of $15M. Notably, Fuego Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CRA International's PE ratio is 24.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuego Enterprises is -- versus 1.68x for CRA International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DLH Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Fuego Enterprises's net margin of 1.23%. Fuego Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat DLH Holdings's return on equity of 5.87%.

Fuego Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DLH Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 310.96%. Given that DLH Holdings has higher upside potential than Fuego Enterprises, analysts believe DLH Holdings is more attractive than Fuego Enterprises.

Fuego Enterprises has a beta of 2.907, which suggesting that the stock is 190.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DLH Holdings has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.471%.

Fuego Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DLH Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuego Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DLH Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuego Enterprises quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DLH Holdings quarterly revenues of $90.8M. Fuego Enterprises's net income of -- is lower than DLH Holdings's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Fuego Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DLH Holdings's PE ratio is 8.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuego Enterprises is -- versus 0.14x for DLH Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VizConnect has a net margin of -- compared to Fuego Enterprises's net margin of --. Fuego Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat VizConnect's return on equity of --.

Fuego Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VizConnect has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fuego Enterprises has higher upside potential than VizConnect, analysts believe Fuego Enterprises is more attractive than VizConnect.

Fuego Enterprises has a beta of 2.907, which suggesting that the stock is 190.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VizConnect has a beta of 30.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2912.289%.

Fuego Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VizConnect offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuego Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VizConnect pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuego Enterprises quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VizConnect quarterly revenues of --. Fuego Enterprises's net income of -- is lower than VizConnect's net income of --. Notably, Fuego Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VizConnect's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuego Enterprises is -- versus 0.00x for VizConnect. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.